16/10/2026
In rural insurance, the difference between being insured and being truly protected often only becomes apparent when a loss occurs.
Law No. 15,526/2026 introduced significant changes to Brazil's rural insurance system and seeks to address problems that farmers have long experienced in practice.
One of these concerns the premium subsidy itself.
The Federal Government contributes to the payment of part of the insurance premium to reduce the cost of the policy for farmers. In recent years, however, the promised funds have not always been made available as expected.
In 2026, for example, the budget initially allocated to rural insurance amounted to approximately BRL 1.01 billion, but a freeze of around BRL 461.7 million was announced.
In practice, farmers calculate their costs, plan their growing seasons and purchase insurance based on an expected premium. When public funding fails to materialize, what should provide security instead becomes a source of uncertainty.
The new law seeks to address this problem by protecting funds allocated to the subsidy against budgetary freezes.
The principle is simple: insurance needs to work before a problem occurs.
But receiving the subsidy and purchasing a policy are only the beginning.
Due diligence must begin before signing
One of the greatest challenges in rural insurance is that farmers often discover the exact scope of their coverage only after suffering a loss.
That is when questions arise:
Was hail damage covered?
Was drought covered?
What happens in the event of excessive rainfall?
What yield level was used as the basis for the policy?
Is there a deductible?
Under what circumstances may the insurer deny compensation?
What must the farmer do after a loss occurs?
These answers need to be clear before the contract is signed, not after the crop has been lost.
For this reason, reviewing the insurance proposal, the policy's general terms and conditions, exclusions, insured yield, covered risks and obligations imposed on the farmer can help prevent future disputes.
This is precisely where specialized legal advice can make a difference.
Not to complicate the purchasing process, but to ensure that farmers understand what they are buying and the extent of their protection.
When a loss occurs, another stage begins
Drought, hail, excessive rainfall, frost and other events can compromise in a short period a crop that has taken months to grow.
The new law seeks to bring greater structure to this stage.
It provides greater clarity regarding the required documentation and establishes deadlines for certain stages of the claims assessment process.
In some circumstances, the assessment must be completed within 15 days. Indemnity payments must comply with a maximum deadline of 30 days, subject to the conditions established by law.
This matters because, in agriculture, time is money.
After a loss, farmers must decide whether to replant, harvest, clear the land and, above all, how to continue meeting their financial obligations.
One point, however, will remain decisive: evidence of the loss.
The assessment conducted by the insurer's loss adjuster will play an important role in determining the cause and extent of the damage.
From the outset, farmers should therefore carefully preserve photographs, videos, weather records, agronomic reports, communications with the insurer and any other documents related to the event.
An unfavorable conclusion by the insurer does not necessarily mean the matter is closed.
If technical evidence supports a different assessment of the circumstances, the denial of coverage or the amount of compensation may need to be reviewed and challenged.
Where does legal assistance come in?
Legal support in rural insurance should not begin only when the insurer denies a claim.
It can start before the policy is signed.
A lawyer familiar with agricultural activities can assist farmers at three critical stages:
Before signing, by reviewing coverage, exclusions, obligations, deductibles and policy conditions.
When a loss occurs, by providing guidance on notification requirements, documentation and the preservation of evidence.
After the claim assessment, by reviewing any denial, reduction in compensation or failure to comply with the contractual terms.
The objective is simple: to prevent farmers from discovering, only after losing their crops, that the insurance they thought they had did not provide the protection they expected.
Rural insurance and agricultural credit are becoming more closely linked
The new law also brings rural insurance closer to financing arrangements.
The policy may form part of the collateral securing a credit transaction, and the indemnity payment may be linked to repayment of the financing.
This reinforces something that is already evident in agriculture:
If the crop disappears, the debt does not disappear with it.
When insurance works as intended, part of the loss is absorbed by the insurance system, giving farmers better conditions to continue producing.
When it does not, crop losses can quickly lead to loan defaults, debt renegotiations and financial pressure on subsequent growing seasons.
That is why managing risk before a loss occurs is more effective than trying to resolve the crisis afterward.
Law No. 15,526/2026 represents an important step forward.
However, a better law alone does not guarantee fair compensation.
True protection still begins with carefully reviewing the policy, continues with the proper documentation of the loss and, when necessary, culminates in defending the farmer's rights against the insurer.
In rural insurance, having a policy is not enough. Farmers need to know whether it truly protects what they believe they have insured.
Guilherme Spiller,